@DarrenEaston
Advocate for health, wealth & property rights
https://x.com/dazeaston
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
Don’t be John.
In November 2025, John and Dave both sat in the same Barclays branch in Manchester. Same day, same adviser, same polite smile.
The adviser slid two pieces of paper across the table.
To John: a shiny new platinum credit card, pre-approved £15,000 limit.
To Dave: the now-famous text on his phone:
“From 2 December we’re restricting crypto transfers to protect you.”
John laughed. “Crypto’s gambling, mate. I’ll take the card. Need a new telly and a holiday.”
Dave asked quietly, “So you’ll let me borrow £10,000 at 39.9% to blow on anything I want, but you won’t let me send £10,001 of my own money to buy Bitcoin?”
The adviser shrugged. “Rules are rules. We have to keep you safe.”
Five winters later, November 2030.
John is 42, divorced, living in a rented one-bed flat above a chicken shop.
Every month for five years he has paid Barclays £250–£330, whatever he could scrape together after rent.
Total sent to Barclays: £19,847.
Still owes: £8,916.
The holiday photos are long deleted. The telly broke two years ago.
His credit score is 412. No lender will touch him. He is trapped.
Dave is 42, mortgage-free on a three-bed house he bought in 2028 with part of his stack.
That original £10,000 sent to Kraken in 2025 is now worth £215,000.
He paid Barclays exactly £28 in Faster Payment fees, five years ago.
That is all.
John sees Barclays adverts on the bus:
“Banking that looks after you.”
Every time he reads those words, he feels something cold crawl across his chest.
He realises the protection was never for him.
It was protection for Barclays’ profit margins.
Protection from customers like Dave who might stop feeding the debt machine.
Protection from the terrifying idea that ordinary people could escape the slow grind of 39.9% interest and actually build wealth.
John was the good customer.
Dave was the threat.
And the bank chose who to “protect” accordingly.
Don’t be John.
In November 2025, John and Dave both sat in the same Barclays branch in Manchester. Same day, same adviser, same polite smile.
The adviser slid two pieces of paper across the table.
To John: a shiny new platinum credit card, pre-approved £15,000 limit.
To Dave: the now-famous text on his phone:
“From 2 December we’re restricting crypto transfers to protect you.”
John laughed. “Crypto’s gambling, mate. I’ll take the card. Need a new telly and a holiday.”
Dave asked quietly, “So you’ll let me borrow £10,000 at 39.9% to blow on anything I want, but you won’t let me send £10,001 of my own money to buy Bitcoin?”
The adviser shrugged. “Rules are rules. We have to keep you safe.”
Five winters later, November 2030.
John is 42, divorced, living in a rented one-bed flat above a chicken shop.
Every month for five years he has paid Barclays £250–£330, whatever he could scrape together after rent.
Total sent to Barclays: £19,847.
Still owes: £8,916.
The holiday photos are long deleted. The telly broke two years ago.
His credit score is 412. No lender will touch him. He is trapped.
Dave is 42, mortgage-free on a three-bed house he bought in 2028 with part of his stack.
That original £10,000 sent to Kraken in 2025 is now worth £215,000.
He paid Barclays exactly £28 in Faster Payment fees, five years ago.
That is all.
John sees Barclays adverts on the bus:
“Banking that looks after you.”
Every time he reads those words, he feels something cold crawl across his chest.
He realises the protection was never for him.
It was protection for Barclays’ profit margins.
Protection from customers like Dave who might stop feeding the debt machine.
Protection from the terrifying idea that ordinary people could escape the slow grind of 39.9% interest and actually build wealth.
John was the good customer.
Dave was the threat.
And the bank chose who to “protect” accordingly.
Don’t be John.
1❤️1
They can just buy it not tell their shitty government about it. If the sole purpose of buying these things is to declare it and pay taxes on it, then fuck that. Dumb shit.
The problem with that logic: it only works until you need to spend the money.
Buying property, investing, even opening certain accounts triggers source-of-wealth checks.
If your BTC isn’t declared, you’re effectively locked out of the legitimate financial system.
Buying property, investing, even opening certain accounts triggers source-of-wealth checks.
If your BTC isn’t declared, you’re effectively locked out of the legitimate financial system.
Just buy the real fuckin thing ffs
I agree but there are investors in the UK who want BTC exposure in their SIPP pension wrapper and tax efficient ISA wrapper who may have bought SWC as an alternative due to the FCA's restrictions on buying BTC ETFs
The FCA’s move to lift its ban on #Bitcoin ETFs is great for retail investors but bad news for BTC-treasury stocks like $SWC.
When you can buy a regulated BTC ETF, why pay a premium for a web-design company that just hoards Bitcoin?
mNAVs are collapsing
When you can buy a regulated BTC ETF, why pay a premium for a web-design company that just hoards Bitcoin?
mNAVs are collapsing
5
Well I don't consider myself financially educated at all. Well now I am more thanks to studying bitcoin but I find it fascinating in a scope much broader than strictly finance.
Indeed it has far reaching scope beyond just number go up. #Bitcoin stops governments from printing endless cash to fund wars. Imagine that—no magic money machine for destruction. Just a system where people have control, not politicians.
Why so few understand, appreciate and study #bitcoin ?
Why so many literate and intelligent people reject it?
Isn't it obvious that it is a gateway to knowledge and progress?
As an artist I find this ...
Many are not financially educated and those that are cannot fit #bitcoin into their financial model
1🤙1