@Nyoro~n
#bitcoin 🧐 🇹🇼⚡
Relays (4)
- wss://relay.bitdevs.tw/ – read & write
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
- wss://wot.utxo.one/ – write
- wss://relay.primal.net/ – write
Recent Notes
I support BIP110 because Bitcoin is essential to the future of mankind and the last 8 months have proven it to be the best immediate solution to the critical injury inflicted by Core 30.
i support it because i have no reason to be against it
none of the transactions i make or plan to make are affected by the temporary restrictions 👍
none of the transactions i make or plan to make are affected by the temporary restrictions 👍
IBD is up to 25-40 % faster now. You should really try it in Oct with Core 32 ;)
A node costs nothing. Bitcoin core (or for you: Knots) is free. No idea what you are talking about here... Old noteboo...
ibd is faster on the newer versions compared to the older ones because the assumevalid bypasses validation for much of the spam of the last 3 years.
v28 - block 856760 (august 2024)
v29 - block 886157
v30 - block 912683 (september 2025)
theres incremental improvements for assumevalid=0 across versions but insignificant to most hardware
just did a reindex recently
v28 - block 856760 (august 2024)
v29 - block 886157
v30 - block 912683 (september 2025)
theres incremental improvements for assumevalid=0 across versions but insignificant to most hardware
just did a reindex recently
1
I love it when monetary maxis find blocks ❤ https://npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr.blossom.band/77042712a13e0079a779b2e3eca388aa60fa6c5eb6b1914feacd66bc5cd47ae4.jpg
enjoyed your stream, regrettably my banned youtube account cant join the live chat 🤣
1❤️1
a few months ago i moved my blocksdir off my node's 1TB SSD to a spinning disk drive to put off buying a 2TB SSD
had a random chainstate database corruption a couple days ago
reindex-chainstate took 20 hours 🫠🫠
had a random chainstate database corruption a couple days ago
reindex-chainstate took 20 hours 🫠🫠
Are you seriously calling 10% of nodes, zero miner support, and no backing from the wider community a "consensus"? That’s not consensus, that's just your echo chamber.
100% of nodes accept bip-110 blocks
1👍2✅1🤙1
How do you find the video stream?
on twitter i just put in the match hashtag and scroll through latest until something pops up
it brought me to a streaming site ssh101, look up channel canalwc2026
it brought me to a streaming site ssh101, look up channel canalwc2026
2
my preferred way to watch world cup is finding a stream from social media, then dig into the ad-riddled page to find where the video stream (m3u) is hosted. then stick it in vlc or add it to jellfin liveTV
the best streams are almost always from mexico, dont understand what they're saying but sure sounds exciting -- bless them 🙏
the best streams are almost always from mexico, dont understand what they're saying but sure sounds exciting -- bless them 🙏
52❤️2🍻1🎉1
What Luke is referring to is a permanent chain split, not a temporary chain divergence that will eventually realign with the legacy chain regardless of BIP-110 succeeding or failing. And if the game t...
theres also that funky period between mandatory flagging and rule enforcement where miners (regardless of their stance on arbitrary data) scratch their head about whether or not to risk blocks being thrown away for the sake of flipping one bit 😅
1
The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is suff...
without rdts in a contentious scenario (bip-110 doesnt die immediately) nothing stops that legacy node from throwing away those blocks if for whatever reason bip-110 blocks gets longer. something as benign as insane luck, edges cases for being offline too long, or not hearing about the legacy chain from ill-timed peers etc can trigger this
since the reasons to throw away already-validated blocks can vary, it would happen seemingly at random with little to no notice to the user. This makes the node unreliable as it has to redownload and revalidate invalid/legacy blocks while being unavailable to validate and relay new blocks/transactions from that chain. with enough unreliability from the nodes running invalid/legacy chain; it can lead to wipeout and replacement by bip110 as it wipeout scenario only goes in one direction.
tldr; without rdts theres no mechanism for nodes to hold onto the invalid/legacy chain other than living with perpetual wipeout risk for the sake of jpegs 😅
since the reasons to throw away already-validated blocks can vary, it would happen seemingly at random with little to no notice to the user. This makes the node unreliable as it has to redownload and revalidate invalid/legacy blocks while being unavailable to validate and relay new blocks/transactions from that chain. with enough unreliability from the nodes running invalid/legacy chain; it can lead to wipeout and replacement by bip110 as it wipeout scenario only goes in one direction.
tldr; without rdts theres no mechanism for nodes to hold onto the invalid/legacy chain other than living with perpetual wipeout risk for the sake of jpegs 😅
tbh this is exactly why we need layers. putting junk on-chain is a dead end. using sats to pay for p2p seeding is teh right way to do it but most dont get it yet
with some torrents older than bitcoin it would seem that if the data is valued enough to keep around people across time will seed it for free 😅
2
A torrent can distribute information, but it cannot guarantee the full fidelity and preservation of that information through time.
If nobody seeds it, it disappears. If multiple versions emerge, ther...
wouldnt you be able to lean on torrents' infohashes to make sure the data remains the same?
why not pay people bitcoin to perpetually seed torrents? wouldnt that effectively be the same thing without all the technical limits of misusing the bitcoin blockchain and the overhead of validating blocks with irrelevant data for this use case?
why not pay people bitcoin to perpetually seed torrents? wouldnt that effectively be the same thing without all the technical limits of misusing the bitcoin blockchain and the overhead of validating blocks with irrelevant data for this use case?
2