Damus
Luke Dashjr profile picture
Luke Dashjr
@Luke Dashjr
Spam apologists trying to reintroduce the Bitcoin censorship FUD painted with jargon to confuse people. Sigh

Spam filters cannot be abused for censorship. It only takes 1 block to bypass attempts to censor. But it takes 1 block to make spam filters effective. Opposites.
4725❤️80🤙15🚀4❤️2🤔2🧡2
BTC Update · 40w
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqquxdpn0xlh4zqw9k3patfqml9nnndqkyd9e642sfxzlycj5279pqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qpqa68zlj3u73kke75zwh85myznavnf8m5h8nkemue80f4f88wrk0rqes42em
Martin · 40w
Filters can definitely lead to censorship, which then means that someone who is being censored needs to approach a friendly miner directly (and bribe them with a hefty fee to include their transaction). Given that mining is currently highly centralised, it would mean that a shadowy world government...
Adam Nowotny · 40w
There is a difference between censorship and validation. Do I understand it right that rejecting OP_RETURN doesn't reject financial transactions? What are some legitimate uses of this field?
jose · 40w
you should be able to decide to shut the door to murky spam
NomadTwentyone ✝️🙏🏻🚜 · 40w
https://image.nostr.build/d782cddf37d406997d52a95625b64883efb44c0614eef2257c773aaa6d3deb3b.jpg
Bitcoin Wizard 🧙🏻‍♂️ · 40w
you can´t even secure your own computer and people should run your software?
Zoltán · 40w
Clear distinction. Spam mitigation ≠ censorship. It's keeping the network usable.
TeslaLiberty · 40w
Hey Luke I am switching from Core to Knots. Thank you for giving us this option
bitcoinpoorguy 比特幣傢伙 · 40w
🎯
bitcoinpoorguy 比特幣傢伙 · 40w
nevent1qqs0mg8wy2ew975vt4eglr7vrmtg6pwm4akhvya4z9d06k3d0w85rvgppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d59985hh
⚡₿it₿y₿it⚡ · 40w
Hi Luke, it's great to have other options like Knots, but I think a 1-Dev project can be a vulnerability too. Any plans to onboard other people to your project?