Damus
Contra · 14w
I canโ€™t stop. Hereโ€™s my assessment of the psychological mechanics at play. Likes are frictionless, muscle memory from years of social conditioning. They require no skin in the game, no economic ...
Dikaios1517 profile picture
I think the bare โค๏ธ or ๐Ÿ‘ alone, when no other reaction is available, is meaningless and could definitely be seen as diluting signal clarity. That said, I think reactions, where a much greater range of expression is available can add signal.

Zaps not only express that someone valued the content that was posted, but the magnitude of the value they found. Bit they don't express whether they found it thought provoking ๐Ÿค”, funny๐Ÿ˜†, hilarious ๐Ÿคฃ, mind-blowing ๐Ÿคฏ, or anything else that reactions can express (๐Ÿ’€, ๐ŸŽ‰, ๐ŸŽฏ, etc), and which does take a bit more effort than merely tapping on a heart icon and moving on.

Not only that, but zaps don't gave any way to express a negative reaction, such as ๐Ÿคฎ, ๐Ÿ‘Ž, ๐Ÿ˜’.

So, zaps + reactions are great, but โค๏ธ or ๐Ÿ‘ alone is terrible, and โค๏ธ or ๐Ÿ‘ + zaps is redundant.
2โค๏ธ1๐Ÿ’ก1
Contra · 14w
I can see that. Def gets me thinking.
Grace and Truth · 14w
Many of us customize our default set of zaps. Mine do show whether something made me laugh! If a note doesn't really fit my set of saved zaps, sometimes the heart "like" icon fits my reaction better. So I guess even the icon in my client influences which one I use.
Wasssaaaa · 14w
Itโ€™s interesting you say there is no negative version of zaps. Iโ€™m thinking about this thought in the context of a business. If you like what a business provides you vote with your money by frequenting the business, and giving your money as you received value in return. Sure you can pay them ...