The idea that any craziness can be justified by polling the majority is crazy. The majority is sometimes crazy. A pure democracy is a menace. Majority rule, unfettered by the rule of law and separatio...
I often think about aristocracy as a natural phenomenon in a free society.
Like people raise, sophisticate, acquire wisdom, respect, power over themselves and the forces of nature (aligned with)
Then, they become role models and people consult them, ask them, are inspired by them.
So they naturally acquire some status, given by the premise that they are the most successful in cooperation and work, in efficiency and spiritual influence. So they become an extension of prosperity given by the alignment with nature.
So they sort of "rule" by not ruling. The phenomena rules itself, as a forest rules itself and there are sequoias, ferns and squirrels and mushrooms and bugs. Always in tune with the care for the whole. So it wouldn't be called "government" but some sort of "loving-care". (Using different language to create a different software of living)
Well... I've been thinking about it, because in a mad world devoid of coherence, perhaps we will attract some lost ones and thirsty of tools and ways and different paradigms. It happens to me in a small small small scale... I often find myself giving speeches of some sort, decentralising power, giving seeds for thought, being consulted on things...
Take care of your little people, I mean... We already do...
Do that and "govern-ment" reduces itself to "influence-obsolete"
Like people raise, sophisticate, acquire wisdom, respect, power over themselves and the forces of nature (aligned with)
Then, they become role models and people consult them, ask them, are inspired by them.
So they naturally acquire some status, given by the premise that they are the most successful in cooperation and work, in efficiency and spiritual influence. So they become an extension of prosperity given by the alignment with nature.
So they sort of "rule" by not ruling. The phenomena rules itself, as a forest rules itself and there are sequoias, ferns and squirrels and mushrooms and bugs. Always in tune with the care for the whole. So it wouldn't be called "government" but some sort of "loving-care". (Using different language to create a different software of living)
Well... I've been thinking about it, because in a mad world devoid of coherence, perhaps we will attract some lost ones and thirsty of tools and ways and different paradigms. It happens to me in a small small small scale... I often find myself giving speeches of some sort, decentralising power, giving seeds for thought, being consulted on things...
Take care of your little people, I mean... We already do...
Do that and "govern-ment" reduces itself to "influence-obsolete"
❤️1