Damus
Open in Damus
BIT 🐳 ISH 🤌🏽 Italianhands · 1w
For example: ❌️ "You don't support bip110? You must be a pedophile" vs ✅️ "Not supporting bip110 leaves the door open for csam" Same end goal but entirely different conversations.
 Ferris Bueller BIP110 profile picture
Ferris Bueller BIP110 @Bitcoinmaxi
What about calling someone a spammer or a scammer? There is no proof that anybody within these conversations is a pedophile, but if you support ordinals, inscriptions, brc 20 tokens, ect, that's an objective spammer because of their actions right? Should that person not recieve hostility within the community?

1❤️1
BIT 🐳 ISH 🤌🏽 Italianhands · 1w
Does that further the technical discussion? What are you gaining by calling someone a scammer over what is ultimately an unprovable position? Are ordinals scams? Some say yes, some say no. Its not objectively provable across the board as a blanket statement. So making that leap of assumption calling...