I like it. Err, I like it more than I dislike it. Its a net like. And I think most differences are contrived for the sake of maintaining teams.
When I look at Christianity and Islam, for example, I ...
I'm starting to understand that it's the __drive to resolution__ that makes everyone pissed off. Bitcoin is volitile? Volitility is life.
Allow me a detour here:
In a body, where you have a mass of heterogenous cells, the "state" of the body is behind our eyes. We force our body to engage in activity that we are driven by - say smoking.
This produces a hostile environment for the lung neighborhood. The lung cells say "this place is trying to kill me. I need to adapt, and survive against this hostile environment. I can't listen to anything telling me to stop growing otherwise I'll die - I need to also convince and recruit my neighbors!"
And then the body gets lung cancer. The body is a mostly closed system, so if the cancer actually overtakes the territory and wins the game, the body dies.
In an open system, where collectives __can__ differentiate themselves, the system doesn't die. The "cancer" differentiates into another mass. The ancap and ancomm communities separate into their own societies, without bothering another.
Recursively, if one of those societies does develop another managerial class - then differentiate again, because the __resolution__ is death.
The refusal for settling, and being fiercely in opposition itself, back to volatility - is life itself. The body itself is not one homogenous system, it became a body through differentiation. And the same is for society - the point is to refuse totalization of any sorts.
Allow me a detour here:
In a body, where you have a mass of heterogenous cells, the "state" of the body is behind our eyes. We force our body to engage in activity that we are driven by - say smoking.
This produces a hostile environment for the lung neighborhood. The lung cells say "this place is trying to kill me. I need to adapt, and survive against this hostile environment. I can't listen to anything telling me to stop growing otherwise I'll die - I need to also convince and recruit my neighbors!"
And then the body gets lung cancer. The body is a mostly closed system, so if the cancer actually overtakes the territory and wins the game, the body dies.
In an open system, where collectives __can__ differentiate themselves, the system doesn't die. The "cancer" differentiates into another mass. The ancap and ancomm communities separate into their own societies, without bothering another.
Recursively, if one of those societies does develop another managerial class - then differentiate again, because the __resolution__ is death.
The refusal for settling, and being fiercely in opposition itself, back to volatility - is life itself. The body itself is not one homogenous system, it became a body through differentiation. And the same is for society - the point is to refuse totalization of any sorts.
1