nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpr9mhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5q3samnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46qu7vtcc nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk...
Yeah, framing a legal opinion that you may or may not agree with as a 'threat' is just unproductive hyperbole that this controversy didn't really need more of.