@Judge Hardcase
Relays (4)
- wss://relay.wisp.talk/ – read & write
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
- wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
Recent Notes
I got got
Even the best of us are vulnerable to being duped when someone is flattering our grilling skills. 😉
Is this a bot?
nostr:nevent1qqs8t39u8p97puvcx4d2nmg0udrfg8x599ef2pqvakzehfzlxennj0spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3q3zykh07d5yt7dpw6aje5x6d65ve7jg8fvpnw7hntnxrf3vqcmk4qxpqqqqqqzkgfagk
I sure hope so... that's a lot of total posts on day 1 of joining.
1
That's interesting. I'd heard Coinkite doesn't keep customer data, so I wonder what it could be. Some middleman shipping person taking notes as devices pass by? That's the only thing that comes to min...
Yeah, it could be a middle man shipping person... but this smells to me more like the middle man shipping company itself might have been hacked - exposing past invoice data.
It's great that Coinkite delete's user data, but they can't control the deletion of the data that they had already passed along to someone else.
To me, the bottom line is, there are no guarantees: act accordingly. *and in this case, it sounds like the appropriate skepticism to an unexpected correspondence was indeed applied.
PS. It does seem like Coinkite should take more of an interest in determining if their shipping partner was the weak link here or not. Maybe behind the scenes they will/are. 🤷
It's great that Coinkite delete's user data, but they can't control the deletion of the data that they had already passed along to someone else.
To me, the bottom line is, there are no guarantees: act accordingly. *and in this case, it sounds like the appropriate skepticism to an unexpected correspondence was indeed applied.
PS. It does seem like Coinkite should take more of an interest in determining if their shipping partner was the weak link here or not. Maybe behind the scenes they will/are. 🤷
LFG!!! 🚀
Square is introducing a 1% fee for merchants starting next year
true. the fee structures have been changing so often that it's difficult to keep track of what they're paying for anymore. 🤷
❤️1
no 0.9% fee? Interesting. Makes perfect sense, though, to waive that fee when you're just paying one of their other clients via square (they likely aren't even actually converting to BTC since they c...
... which raises the possibility that the 0.9% fee might still apply if the merchant happened to choose to keep btc rather than auto-convert btc to dollars. 🤔
1
I just encountered a square merchant that accepted bitcoin even though they didn’t know they did. There was a toggle on the pay screen to let me choose to pay with bitcoin. I paid with my cash balan...
no 0.9% fee? Interesting. Makes perfect sense, though, to waive that fee when you're just paying one of their other clients via square (they likely aren't even actually converting to BTC since they can just adjust the custodied balances on each side of the transaction).
*I'm going to assume someone of authority there is aware of that toggle... just not the minimum wage employee running the cash register at the time. 😉
*I'm going to assume someone of authority there is aware of that toggle... just not the minimum wage employee running the cash register at the time. 😉
2
Alright insurance officially just wrote off my car, I do not understand this at all but new car is always fun
newer car usually translates to higher monthly insurance premium. mystery solved. 😉
❤️1
So, last week Strategy sold MSTR at an average price of ~$121/share and bought BTC at an average price of ~$63K. With BTC that low, IMO, this will almost certainly end up being a good move.
Unfortunately, just last month, at their Q1 earnings call, they revealed the slide below to explain when selling shares to buy BTC would be accretive (and vice versa). Based on the average prices above, prior to these moves, their BTC Reserves sat at ~$53B, and their ADSO Market Cap sat at only ~$46B - well below the "BPS Accretive Breakeven" point as indicated by their own slide.
As per usual, Saylor's biggest PR problem (and likely rating agency problem, btw) isn't that he's selling equities to buy bitcoin... it's that he keeps saying one thing while doing another.
Unfortunately, just last month, at their Q1 earnings call, they revealed the slide below to explain when selling shares to buy BTC would be accretive (and vice versa). Based on the average prices above, prior to these moves, their BTC Reserves sat at ~$53B, and their ADSO Market Cap sat at only ~$46B - well below the "BPS Accretive Breakeven" point as indicated by their own slide.
As per usual, Saylor's biggest PR problem (and likely rating agency problem, btw) isn't that he's selling equities to buy bitcoin... it's that he keeps saying one thing while doing another.