@Judge Hardcase
Relays (4)
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
- wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
- wss://relay.mostr.pub/ – read
Recent Notes
it’s not an interpretation. read the text of the message - this is something generated by his AI as a “concern”, not from X’s API or front-end
I've read it... what text exactly is it that you think provides any indication what it was generated by?
guys, I understand that there is censorship in centralized platforms - but the message here has nothing to do with X "blocking" his AI agent.
this is Jeff's agent SELF-censoring - this is not in X p...
You're not providing much reason to accept your interpretation instead of Jeff's. I think we all should know by now that there are no assurances that X won't block, censor, or shadowban even something that "is not in X policies whatsoever".
1
A post from my AI agent was just blocked on X for “implying criticism of central banks or their policies”
Free thought and first principles are dangerous to a control system.
https://image.nost...
The funniest part is that the other 3 'concerns' are so obviously BS that it reveals the only plausible real motive for censorship to be the only one left standing: criticism of central banks and the current financial system.
* I guess now that X tells you anything about why they're censoring your post is an impovement in itself.
* I guess now that X tells you anything about why they're censoring your post is an impovement in itself.
🤙1
blockfi was a scam
celsius was a scam
luna was a scam
but strc is basically the iphone
https://blossom.primal.net/d223b5ddb0882d98bb8ef31be07b6e0d23ea21446a316a4c375b4bf3d000ab50.jpg
Referring to a liability as "revenue" seems like clear gas-lighting to me.
How will the ships sail?! They're gonna have to wait 10 minutes!!
Zero confirmation... My guess is ships will still be well within missile range should a payment happen to be reversed. 😉
1🤙1
How is speculation that Adam Back is Satoshi even newsworthy? I mean, hasn't Adam been near the top of any such list since like forever? At least HBO's Peter Todd speculation was a little bit out of left field.
Also, apparently, the only reason the recent NYT 'journalist' ever even became suspicious of Adam was because of how tense and uncomfortable he seemed during those HBO interviews. Has anyone ever seen an interview of Adam where he didn't seem tense and uncomfortable?
Also, apparently, the only reason the recent NYT 'journalist' ever even became suspicious of Adam was because of how tense and uncomfortable he seemed during those HBO interviews. Has anyone ever seen an interview of Adam where he didn't seem tense and uncomfortable?
Iran says ships passing through Strait of Hormuz must pay with #bitcoin 👀
"Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in bitcoin, ensuring th...
"can't be traced"? An indefinite number of $1M transactions? Good luck with that.
"...or confiscated"? No prob... at least not until the CRQC fantasy somehow becomes reality.
"...or confiscated"? No prob... at least not until the CRQC fantasy somehow becomes reality.
21
"Linux is free if you don't value your time"
Heard on a podcast during my #40hpw (can't remember which one, but it made me laugh) - its less true now that I can ask an AI how to do all the stuff I ca...
That's funny. The primary reason I left Windows for Linux was how much time was chronically being wasted waiting for surprise forced updates/reboots.
2
Just pay on chain, and wait the standard 6 confirmations (~1 hour on average). It's not like they're going to be holding up the queue at a toll booth.
Even if it *could* be done over lightning, fees for a $1M transaction would almost certainly be much, much lower on chain as well (because on chain fees are the same for a $1M transaction as for a $1 transaction).
Even if it *could* be done over lightning, fees for a $1M transaction would almost certainly be much, much lower on chain as well (because on chain fees are the same for a $1M transaction as for a $1 transaction).
Imagine concluding someone was batman because they are an orphan. That’s what he is doing here.
I'm guessing what he's doing here is much worse. At least being an orphan has an objective meaning. Whereas, tallying writing faux-pas in what are presumably completely informal forums should be expected to eliminate approximately zero of any other potential suspects.
1
Having now read the NYT article I can confirm you don’t need to.
Here is a piece of evidence for the proposition its Back:
>> He also used other words and phrases Mr. Back had used: “widesprea...
Wow! Satoshi's identity busted by a Grammar Nazi... or is that supposed to be Grammar-Nazi? O shit!
1