So let me get this straight.
Sztorc decides to fork Bitcoin and call it eCash. Before it goes live, he edits the copy—changes who owns what, reassigns coins he doesn't control.
No key. No signatu...
meh. This is nothing new. There are literally thousands of networks of money - each with its own governance consensus - that don't care about my keys.
Cryptographic ownership on the network(s) of money that I choose to recognize is only relevant to the extent that others make that same choice - regardless of any 'consensus' that voluntarily (or otherwise) make a separate choice. This has inherently always been the deal.
Cryptographic ownership on the network(s) of money that I choose to recognize is only relevant to the extent that others make that same choice - regardless of any 'consensus' that voluntarily (or otherwise) make a separate choice. This has inherently always been the deal.
1