Damus
mleku · 14h
480 * 360 = 172800 and that only occupies a space of 18" diagonal in your vision, and the thing that made it ded more than anything else was 60hz refresh rate. most people can't tolerate displays lik...
mike profile picture
Wait, wot!

This is late 80's to mid 90's technology we're talking about and you think a 60Hz refresh rate killed the product? ๐Ÿ˜‚

Not the 50Kg backpack you need to carry the computer in, or the ethernet cable trailing out the back, or the power supply you need to be near ๐Ÿ˜‚

That's like saying that horse won't work because the exhaust pipe produces too much shit ๐Ÿ˜‚
1๐Ÿ˜‚1
mleku · 14h
yes, i remember it. and it really hasn't got so much better it's worth wasting your time on either. i wouldn't mind having a display and input system i can operate while laying down right now tho. but it's too bulky, even just normal eyeglasses get in the way too much while laying down in a bed.