How do you believe so? I assume because enforcing strict transaction use requires more and more filters in the future? In that case you might be right. But I was referring to being conservative on the...
No. Enforcing strict transaction use requires consensus change -> fork.
Decreasing the volume of spam might be achieved with filters. But does not enforce anything.
(If there is one miner with "custom" mempool filters the spam will be mined. Most of the miners are aware of config file on their node and want to get payed)
Decreasing the volume of spam might be achieved with filters. But does not enforce anything.
(If there is one miner with "custom" mempool filters the spam will be mined. Most of the miners are aware of config file on their node and want to get payed)