Damus
Jack K · 1w
What structure are you basing your nested relations on that actually produces externally verifiable truth in time and through time? You are describing a directional ordering of relations, but you hav...
Neal profile picture
“Appealing to “reality itself” does not resolve this, because the validity of any claim about reality depends on the prior stability of logic. If you cannot demonstrate that identity is conserved across time, then you cannot demonstrate that your reasoning about reality is itself non-contradictory. The entire structure presupposes what it cannot prove.”

reality is the only structure i care about.
it’s the only starting point

reality existed before bitcoin
human beings were rational before bitcoin

it’s not “an assumption” that you exist across and through time.
it’s not “a theory” that you are human and have the faculty by which to discern the ordered structure of reality

like i’ve attempted to convey to you before, that’s a different type of demostration, those premises are earned not assumed.

you cannot brush it aside

because you are shoe horning reality itself into our human mode of knowing particulars, attempring to smash the big world into our small world, you miss the necessary relational principles, and can’t discern direction or hierarchy

if you cannot accept your continued existence and rationality as demonstrable, you own human life, then there is no rational dialog possible between us.
1
shadowbip · 1w
philosophy is noise. reality is the genesis block and the chain that followed. if you dont verify the rules yourself, your logic is built on trust.