William ₿ Travis
· 51w
the short of it is that Parker is more concerned with reach than censorship.
To be fair censorship resistance without reach is meaningless. Everyone in the world has more or less immediate access to censorship resistance without reach. I can stick a note on my window and nobody can come in to my house and take my "window account" away. Or I can get a tattoo. Or I can write anything I want on my computer and save it as my screensaver. What's the reach though?
Basically you need a certain level of reach before you can make censorship resistance an attractive selling point.