lot of people seem concerned about ‘quantum risk’
i dont think its a short term risk but we should probably prioritize mitigations over the next five years regardless
For the layman Bitcoiner:
QC/QT is built on an incoherent theory of fractional commitment, the belief that unmeasured potential states can be treated as real physical states, that superposition is a kind of “double-spending” of existence. All of it rests on a model that never defines what existence or measurement actually is, no definition for time. A theory Bitcoin has been openly falsifying for the last sixteen years without any recognition. The double spend problem is a physics problem.
It’s time we actually stand behind Bitcoin and what its physics reveal. Bitcoin is losing the narrative war to a fiat theory of physics.
QC/QT is built on an incoherent theory of fractional commitment, the belief that unmeasured potential states can be treated as real physical states, that superposition is a kind of “double-spending” of existence. All of it rests on a model that never defines what existence or measurement actually is, no definition for time. A theory Bitcoin has been openly falsifying for the last sixteen years without any recognition. The double spend problem is a physics problem.
It’s time we actually stand behind Bitcoin and what its physics reveal. Bitcoin is losing the narrative war to a fiat theory of physics.
