Okay guy. We'll see how it goes. It will either be dead within an hour and 15 minutes or capitulated to by the miners.
What's even crazier is I'm not even a BIP110 guy. I just can see that you guys d...
Good Lord.
"Soft forks that are not actively opposed with a URSF are likely to succeed because they conform with all of the consensus rules of the previous versions."
So what you are telling me is that after mandatory activation (after BIP-9 activation fails) BIP-110 enforcing nodes will accept blocks with transactions that include OP_RETURNs of greater than 83 bytes? I promise you, there will be many in the first block after BIP-110 nodes start enforcing their new rules and if the BIP-110 software is written correctly (big if), those nodes will reject blocks that contain transactions with large OP_RETURNs. BIP-110 nodes will end up on their own chain with almost no hash power.
You will see smart guy.
"Soft forks that are not actively opposed with a URSF are likely to succeed because they conform with all of the consensus rules of the previous versions."
So what you are telling me is that after mandatory activation (after BIP-9 activation fails) BIP-110 enforcing nodes will accept blocks with transactions that include OP_RETURNs of greater than 83 bytes? I promise you, there will be many in the first block after BIP-110 nodes start enforcing their new rules and if the BIP-110 software is written correctly (big if), those nodes will reject blocks that contain transactions with large OP_RETURNs. BIP-110 nodes will end up on their own chain with almost no hash power.
You will see smart guy.