Damus
BitcoinLizard · 4w
You are nutty. There is 1% of the network at best that support BIP-110. The other thing to consider: If #Bitcoin consensus rules can be altered by a mentally ill developer, an obvious spook, and a t...
JackTheMimic profile picture
Okay guy. We'll see how it goes. It will either be dead within an hour and 15 minutes or capitulated to by the miners.

What's even crazier is I'm not even a BIP110 guy. I just can see that you guys don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Soft forks that are not actively opposed with a URSF are likely to succeed because they conform with all of the consensus rules of the previous versions. The miners only matter in so far that they produce the blocks, but they work for the nodes. If you produce work that the nodes find invalid, it doesn't matter.

Take this for instance, if the Fed used a proof of work chain to produce dollars and they had 99% of the proof of work power but Bitcoin nodes at 1% didn't find any of the blocks that they produced as valid, the Fed doesn't fucking matter. You are taking the position of the big blockers back in 2017. "you don't have any of the big mining support." that's something Roger Ver thought.

Learn some Bitcoin history before you go talking about how your way is the righteous way.
1
Based Truth · 4w
BIP110 a desperate ploy by Blockstream and Core to strangle Bitcoin's growth.
BitcoinLizard · 4w
Good Lord. "Soft forks that are not actively opposed with a URSF are likely to succeed because they conform with all of the consensus rules of the previous versions." So what you are telling me is that after mandatory activation (after BIP-9 activation fails) BIP-110 enforcing nodes will accept bl...