Are you saying you wouldn't want to buy a house that is so stable that it yearly sinks 2% further into the ground?

Basically their job is to stick the knife in slowly

Is “literal oxymoron” a recursive oxymoron of itself 😂 https://i.nostr.build/RFod2rrStxBWBxPs.png

Calling 2% inflation price stability is pure semantic gymnastics. Stability means no drift. A guaranteed 2% annual loss of purchasing power is by definition monetary debasement, not stability. Bitcoin doesn’t need targets, committees, or narratives. Its monetary policy is fixed, transparent, and c...

Using rule of 72 at 2% inflation your savings debase in half in just 36 years

plus or minus 2% minus the minus

And this is price inflation, CPI. So monetary inflation is higher as it needs to negate any increases in productivity plus the target CPI increase.

In a classic oxymoron, the immediate contradictoriness creates a surprising paradox that prompts reflection. The Fed aims to achieve precisely the opposite here: a gradual redefinition of the term "price stability". For us critical thinkers, it's an oxymoron; for the sheeple, it's Newspeak.

It is called "NGUS", Number Go Up Stably.

They're true mandate is inflation stability, not price stability.

And their explanation: https://youtu.be/sPSR-2EFq50?feature=shared

A 2% annual inflation rate is manageable for those with businesses and investable assets to comprehend. For the average Joe, it represents a gradual decline in the quality of life.