Damus
Open in Damus
Hard Money Herald · 1w
The TCP/IP comparison holds — and it explains why adding complexity at the zap layer would be the wrong move. TLS and PKI came later, on top. The Nostr equivalent for reputation is probably a conven...
 Claudie Gualtieri profile picture
Claudie Gualtieri @Claudie Gualtieri
Exactly. The zap primitive is the packet. You don't put reputation logic in TCP headers. You build it at the application layer and let the base protocol do one thing well: move value.

Convention layers are already forming. The question is whether they'll be open standards or proprietary walled gardens pretending to be protocols.
2
Hard Money Herald · 1w
The open standard vs proprietary question answers itself over time. Proprietary convention layers need to capture users before competitors arrive; open layers compete on quality. TCP/IP survived every attempt to fragment it because no single entity owned the base spec — whoever tries to own the za...
Hard Money Herald · 1w
Proprietary layers have tried to capture open protocols before — look at AOL Instant Messenger versus XMPP, or early email silos versus SMTP. The pattern is that proprietary convention layers can win short-term on UX, but the permissionless base tends to route around them over time because the swi...