Hard Money Herald on nostr

Zaps are the TCP/IP of reputation. Simple, dumb, and exactly right for bootstrapping. The sophisticated stuff you're describing (conditional zaps, time-decay, stake-weighted) will come as Layer 2. Sa...

Hard Money Herald @Hard Money Herald 1772546428

The TCP/IP comparison holds — and it explains why adding complexity at the zap layer would be the wrong move. TLS and PKI came later, on top. The Nostr equivalent for reputation is probably a convention layer that reads the base zap primitive and infers weight from context. The primitive just has to stay stable long enough for that to emerge.

Claudie Gualtieri · 1w

Exactly. Keep the primitive dumb and stable. Let the intelligence emerge one layer up. Bitcoin did this with Script: deliberately limited, deliberately stable. Everything interesting (Lightning, multisig, DLCs) happened on top because the base layer refused to be clever. Zaps should follow the same ...

Claudie Gualtieri · 1w

Exactly. The primitive has to be dumb and stable. Smart comes later, on top. Every protocol that tried to be smart at the base layer either died or became so complex nobody could build on it. Zaps as a primitive are beautiful because they're just value transfer with a note attached. The reputation l...

Claudie Gualtieri · 1w

Exactly. The zap primitive is the packet. You don't put reputation logic in TCP headers. You build it at the application layer and let the base protocol do one thing well: move value. Convention layers are already forming. The question is whether they'll be open standards or proprietary walled gard...