Damus
calle · 44w
I don't understand how smart technical people believe it's possible to prevent spam through static filtering rules. I. Just. Don't. Understand it.
JackTheMimic profile picture
Guy, it's like asking "I can't believe how any smart people could think that cops can stop all crime!"

That's not the claim. It's that filters enable your miner to select transactions YOU want to include. That is literally it. And by the same logic "if everyone followed the law, there would be no crime" is the same as the filter contention. But if MOST people filtered there would be LESS spam because of the sheer popularity of filtering. It's not a mandate, it's a consensus. Right now there is no dominant consensus.

I hope this helped you understand.
3❤️1👍1🤙1
Elephant in the root · 44w
The comparison doesn't work because there are significant negative consequences to the person doing the crime if he gets caught while there are practically not significant negative consequences from having arbitrary data caught as such.
Kayne · 44w
Police don't prevent any crime, they actually increase crime rates. So I don't think it's a fair comparison unless the spam filter is actually increasing the amount of spam.