One item I notice in your statements of positions is that you tend to assert what the other person is thinking or assuming. It does strike me that this could interfere with actually understanding the ...
Honestly that's totally fine. My original post was a discussion essentially about Objectivists' argumentation regarding God and their assertions relating that to their metaphysics, so that was of course the focus of my further debate into it. I thought it very relevant to the discussion as this was my original intent and interest in critiquing.
The idea itself is something I have spent quite a bit of time pondering over, and what I found lacking from any Objectivist sources or debaters was a serious discussion of the topic that gave any further insight at all, or that even considered the stronger arguments that could be posed by theists or agnostics, of which I have about 30 years of experience being and thinking from those frameworks.
The idea itself is something I have spent quite a bit of time pondering over, and what I found lacking from any Objectivist sources or debaters was a serious discussion of the topic that gave any further insight at all, or that even considered the stronger arguments that could be posed by theists or agnostics, of which I have about 30 years of experience being and thinking from those frameworks.