the narrative that seems to be unfolding around kirk’s alleged assassin is that he was radicalized on internet platforms
will probably be used to further restrict speech
Yes, exactly. They are already working on it. And if they have their way, it’s not going to end there. The “logic” is that Charlie Kirk would not have been assassinated, if:
a) the people in power were in total control of speech (no hate/dangerous speech)
b) the people in power knew everything about everyone’s personal life (no privacy)
c) the plebs would not have guns (goodbye to the 2nd amendment)
Thankfully we simply don’t let them have their way. People are waking up.
a) the people in power were in total control of speech (no hate/dangerous speech)
b) the people in power knew everything about everyone’s personal life (no privacy)
c) the plebs would not have guns (goodbye to the 2nd amendment)
Thankfully we simply don’t let them have their way. People are waking up.
1