I think the "temporary" nature of #BIP110 is actually it's what leads to the reasoning of nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsqzqpxfzhdwlm3cx9l6wdzyft8w8y9...
The temporary part isn't why a reorg is threatened. A reorg is threatened because if in August 110 has 30% hash power and then in December it surges to 60+% hash power, you're looking at a potential for 3+ months of transactions to be reorged out when the 110 chain potentially becomes the heaviest chain. What is known as a flippening.
If you thought CSAM had the potential to kill Bitcoin, see what happens when the presumption of transaction immutability goes out the window.
If you thought CSAM had the potential to kill Bitcoin, see what happens when the presumption of transaction immutability goes out the window.