Damus
U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D · 13w
Not him too. This is Saylor's nonsense rhetoric. Bitcoin does not condense, store, or transfer energy (beyond what all networked computers do). POW on a massive scale requires a lot of energy becaus...
Jack K profile picture
If energy spent produces only heat, how do you explain the existence of a persistent block afterward? What physical process made that block real?

Why can every node instantly reject an invalid block without redoing the work? If the work left no informational trace, wouldn’t validation require recomputation?

Is it possible that nobody has the proper framework to articulate this fully because we have not yet understood how bitcoin is the intersection of computer science, information theory, economics and physics into a measurable instantiation of time itself?

Clearly time is the biggest problem in physics; nobody has a full grasp on entropy.

I find it odd that Bitcoin produces time from entropy. Must be nothin’
❤️1
U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D · 13w
> Why can every node instantly reject an invalid block without redoing the work? Because it takes a massive amount of compute to brute force the output of a hash function to have a long string of consecutive leading zeros (aka POW), and it takes very little compute to verify cryptographic signatur...