You mean the increased productivity an AI can give one human user, means there will be more human users leveraging the tech?

I’m not saying it is wrong, but the flip side would be the introduction of diesel trains led to a reduction in coal for Steam trains perhaps.

i.e. if AI takes over the ‘thinking’ and ‘managing’ then who/what are they controlling? 🤷‍♂️

I’d agree the paradox is fitting, until/unless the human is no longer needed in the ‘production chain'