We should add the ability to down vote 1984 events and then you can rank 1984 reports with trusted pubkeys and same with down votes for them and inform the client of the majority of trusted pubkeys ag...
> inform the client of the majority of trusted pubkeys agree with the report or not
The problem with any kind of labeling from ordinary clients perspective (like YakiHonne) is scaling: it takes time to receive the reports, even more time in total will take to receive the reactions to the reports (or their NIP-45 COUNTs ideally). All this just to decide whether to show a post or not.
Yet I think what you suggest is possible and could be useful at least for trust ranking analysis bots.
Or if you mean to request *something like* a NIP-45 COUNT, so relays could aggregate all reaction counts to all spam reports for given posts in a *single* request—this makes a lot of sense for ordinary clients too, yes. Yet this is hard to promote such a feature because some believe this implies not-dumb-enough-relays.
The problem with any kind of labeling from ordinary clients perspective (like YakiHonne) is scaling: it takes time to receive the reports, even more time in total will take to receive the reactions to the reports (or their NIP-45 COUNTs ideally). All this just to decide whether to show a post or not.
Yet I think what you suggest is possible and could be useful at least for trust ranking analysis bots.
Or if you mean to request *something like* a NIP-45 COUNT, so relays could aggregate all reaction counts to all spam reports for given posts in a *single* request—this makes a lot of sense for ordinary clients too, yes. Yet this is hard to promote such a feature because some believe this implies not-dumb-enough-relays.
3
