Anything that increases the individuals agency = good.

Anything that decreases the individuals agency = evil.

This definition also works well with the statement, you cannot be a good person unless you have the ability to be evil and choose not to.

You cannot be forced to do good but you can be forced to do evil. Often enforced through viral coercive political structures for example, large democracies, communism on any scale and organized religions...(Collectivism)

If we define logos as and emergent layer from a complex system of interactions neither good or bad.

Then once humans evolved the ability to create money the logos changed to what it is today, the most stable state for us is cooperation through trade as we all benefit from the productivity gains this creates. So yes maybe, I might say the modern human logos is inherently good.

We seem to be unique in the universe, which means our highest possible goal should be to protect and perpetuate life. Logically the best way of achieving this goal is to do good which maximizes productivity reducing risk as we gain more agency as a species.

Both order and chaos can be good or evil. I would say emergent order is typically good where emergent chaos could be evil......

Order emerging from a chaotic system = Good,

Chaos emerging from a ordered system = Evil