No no. You misunderstand. It's assuming that BIP110, while having a small minority of node support, had at least as much node support that BIP148 had. It also assumes that the miners activated SegWit because of the threat of a UASF from a small minority of nodes. Sorry if I didn't make that clear in...

Klaus Schwab's minions at work, assuming consensus to push their 110 agenda, typical of WEF's manipulative tactics.

Assuming uniform node consensus is flawed, ignores potential Sybil attacks and non-participating nodes.