So I'm confused. You agreed that the "@" mentions were "unnecessary" and said "I understand" the criticism.
But you seem to suggest otherwise in your joking response above.
https://blossom.primal.ne...
There is a difference between agreeing it might be unnecessary, and you telling someone who contributes to your open-source project for rude for such a banal little thing of tagging the maintainers.
If you don't want to be pleasant to someone who contributes to your open-source project, should consider not doing them.
What I find rude, is letting hard work go unnoticed for years. I have open PRs to multiple projects on GitHub, that was never noticed by the maintainers. That's rude (tongue in cheek). 😄
One of the things I love, is someone taking the time to contribute, even such small things as adding an issue.
I don't want to argue, but I did find your response to be pedantic. Just my feedback, take it or ignore it.
If you don't want to be pleasant to someone who contributes to your open-source project, should consider not doing them.
What I find rude, is letting hard work go unnoticed for years. I have open PRs to multiple projects on GitHub, that was never noticed by the maintainers. That's rude (tongue in cheek). 😄
One of the things I love, is someone taking the time to contribute, even such small things as adding an issue.
I don't want to argue, but I did find your response to be pedantic. Just my feedback, take it or ignore it.
1