That's actually a tough ask. Van Til thought in Dutch and didn't always translate well into English. Most of his books are quite difficult. (He could've learned a thing or two from Rothbard how to be ...
I'll echo the recommendation of Greg Bahnsen's "Van Til's Apologetic." He does a great job of presenting Van Til in more approachable terms.
One that is a bit more broad, comparing the classical, evidential, reformed, and fideist approaches to apologetics in a balanced, clear, and concise manner, with examples of how each approach would attempt to steer a conversation, is "Faith Has Its Reasons" by Kenneth Boa and Robert Bowman Jr.
I need to read more Rothbard... Maybe some summer reading.
One that is a bit more broad, comparing the classical, evidential, reformed, and fideist approaches to apologetics in a balanced, clear, and concise manner, with examples of how each approach would attempt to steer a conversation, is "Faith Has Its Reasons" by Kenneth Boa and Robert Bowman Jr.
I need to read more Rothbard... Maybe some summer reading.
2❤️1🤙1
