Damus
fiatjaf · 43w
Reminds me of nostr:nevent1qywhwumn8ghj7v3nvakhgtnwdaehgu3ww3jkx6rwdakx7eme9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3qamnwvaz7tmp9ehx7uewd3hkctcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem9w3skccne9e3k7mf0wccsqg9ep9k2qusjdhd8tpw5tz2ld06hwyc69fsrq4yr47e003w3e483lyv9fch4 I've changed my mind, nostr:np...
pietre · 43w
Is this still a thing? Sats are the standard my dude nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqwlsccluhy6xxsr6l9a9uhhxf75g85g8a709tprjcn4e42h053vaqqsqu29y7zu4dtpqwhjw6dnctg2545pmtzqjcg30vf07fhcayg46axs7fpfpq
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit · 43w
The .mediawiki at the end made me misread BIP as NIP and get my hopes up for a nostr mediawiki fork
Repeatedly nuked profile · 43w
Very much agreed. Never underestimate the value of people having heard of something.
CanopyKev · 43w
What happens when 8 decimal places is not enough and bitcoin moves to 16? Will the definition of Bitcoin be moved again and again?
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 · 43w
I'll PR this to microsats
DZC · 43w
That ship has already sailed. We must make *sats* the main unit, and keep the Bitcoin name for the network/protocol, imo. 🫂
jb55 · 43w
I'm not against it, although the transition period would be confusing
AU9913 · 43w
I thought 1 bitcoin always equals 1 bitcoin?
Common Sense · 43w
yea, it would be a major ux improvement
davesoma · 43w
I can already hear the midwit chorus: 'Then it wasn’t a fixed number of 21 million—they produced more!'
Manuel · 42w
Hope this happens. Better now than later