Reminds me of nostr:nevent1qywhwumn8ghj7v3nvakhgtnwdaehgu3ww3jkx6rwdakx7eme9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3qamnwvaz7tmp9ehx7uewd3hkctcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem9w3skccne9e3k7mf0wccsqg9ep9k2qusjdhd8tpw5tz2ld06hwyc69fsrq4yr47e003w3e483lyv9fch4 I've changed my mind, nostr:np...

Is this still a thing? Sats are the standard my dude nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqwlsccluhy6xxsr6l9a9uhhxf75g85g8a709tprjcn4e42h053vaqqsqu29y7zu4dtpqwhjw6dnctg2545pmtzqjcg30vf07fhcayg46axs7fpfpq

The .mediawiki at the end made me misread BIP as NIP and get my hopes up for a nostr mediawiki fork

Very much agreed. Never underestimate the value of people having heard of something.

What happens when 8 decimal places is not enough and bitcoin moves to 16? Will the definition of Bitcoin be moved again and again?

I'll PR this to microsats

That ship has already sailed. We must make *sats* the main unit, and keep the Bitcoin name for the network/protocol, imo. 🫂

I'm not against it, although the transition period would be confusing

I thought 1 bitcoin always equals 1 bitcoin?

yea, it would be a major ux improvement

I can already hear the midwit chorus: 'Then it wasn’t a fixed number of 21 million—they produced more!'

Hope this happens. Better now than later