Damus
Laeserin profile picture
Laeserin
@Laeserin
The statistics also say that unhappily married parents are usually _still_ better than unmarried parents, unless they're outright molesting the children or chronically, physically abusive and resistent to therapy. (Which are rare behaviors among the married, and usually not the reason for the split.) We can also expect unhappy marriages to eventually become happy ones, if they just wait long enough, and vice-versa. Marriages fluctuate in quality.

And I think that is the most difficult part for adults to digest, as it means marriage offers children some concrete protection, even if the parents are miserable. We like to think that what makes children happiest is seeing their parents happy, but that isn't actually true. Raising children isn't about _you_, it's about _the children_.

Children don't exist to please their parents; they have their own path. Parents splitting up derails them from that path.
51❤️4👍2🤙2🫂1
Raison d'État · 4w
Does this mean that marriage causes better outcomes (via social pressure? Something else?), or that some mediating variable causes both more formal marriages and better parenting outcomes? Any papers illuminate either way?
Fabiano · 4w
The problem is still the notion of happiness, it seems.
DecBytes · 4w
It is way better for the Children and for both parents, but not only that. It is better for civilization. As George Gilder argue in 'Men and Marriage'. "In creating civilization, women transform male lust into love; channel male wanderlust into jobs, homes, and families; link men to specific chil...
Bitcoin Mises · 4w
Yes