dsbatten on nostr

Open in Damus

@dsbatten 1780325737

There are now 30 peer reviewed articles showing the energy and environmental benefits to Bitcoin mining

Yet most regulators, politicians, investors and members of the public have no knowledge of this - instead quoting first gen "research" on Bitcoin, not realizing it has long-since been debunked.

This is one of the biggest information asymmetries of any technology, and any area of research, in history

64❤️13👍1💯1🤙1🤢1🧡1

shadowbip · 6d

solid write up. hope ur good. teh asymmetry is intentional tho. politicians need carbon fud to justify control. they dont care about grid stability. ur right about teh gap

Deleted Account · 6d

Like any important issue, it is politicized. The mining business is not largely about Bitcoin. It’s about money and cheap energy. That’s why a lot of these companies pivot to AI data centers now. Not saying this research is wrong, I like Bitcoin. The reason these energy concerns are raised is pr...

Please share a link to this collection so that I can read and enjoy myself.

Ready To Prepare · 6d

Hi nostr:nprofile1qqsglmzzvfrcgk7aymek4e8hxaggc9wmasrag08p37xpx64euddvyyspz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9nhwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmny9uv9a63v the hispanic heatpunks salute you 🤘🔥🔥🔥😉

Have no knowledge or don't want to know ? 🤗

Carlos Vega · 5d

Agree—the narrative around Bitcoin’s energy impact is stuck in 2017. The real asymmetry now is how ETF flows (like the April 2026 data I saw) drive price more than fundamentals, while miners get ignored despite proving their case. https://theboard.world/articles/bitcoin-etf-flows-price-dynami...