Damus
djmeistro✝️ 🍊💊⚡️ · 4d
https://blossom.primal.net/9e4e9fabb64587fc0ae0714782fb0e724ba2e87ded3d803b6209833df48b5e28.gif That's all I got
HoloKat · 4d
Why? Most of these are false. Anyone with half a brain understands why. Why waste time on this garbage?
R · 4d
My response would be; Blah blah blah, looks like you got yourself a nice pile of “facts”. So you don’t want to acquire any bitcoin? Nobody cares. Where are you going to put your savings instead? Stocks, bonds, real estate, art, gold, classic cars? Cool, I’m sure there’s no downsides ...
Baerson · 4d
FACT: Staying poor is never fun, ever!
Slimey Limey · 4d
Most of it is correct, but he misunderstood the concept of decentralised… we all know is not about fairly distributed coins, but fairly distributed protocol.
Redstack · 4d
I’ll take two finite mining pools with 49% to 52% than one Fed limitless mining pool at 100%.
Kim Stock · 4d
This is why SIGNUM exists!
ihsotas · 4d
Sounds like this person will be having fun while staying poor. Decentralization is not wealth distribution because owning lots of bitcoin gives you no more control over the network than owning 1 bitcoin.
Jake Woodhouse · 4d
Nice list How about do the same thing with the USD? Then let’s talk
PlebInstitute · 4d
Someone should explain to him the difference between decentralized and distributed 🤷🏽‍♂️
rev.hodl · 4d
The only thing that comes to mind is that this dude must be a huge pussy.
Hide&Seek · 3d
Mining pools doesn't control anything, any miner is free to switch mining pool anytime. Also, concentration of wealth & decentralization of the infrastructure are two different things. Reasoning from facts doesn't prevent cherry picking 🤔
Cosmic Hippo · 3d
Disappointing that no one actually responded too any of these. Not everyone is a maxi with 10 years in bitcoin. Maybe we can add another fact, most bitcoiners dont care whether people adopt bitcoin.