So are you saying in the knots client, it accounts for this failure state and the miners won't have to switch to the core node?
I am saying that what code you run on your node is your opinion on the Bitcoin network. So if a bunch of people have blocks that do not conform with your opinion on the Bitcoin network consensus, you disregard them.
This is not a democracy. This is nodes imposing their will. And the only way that a BIP110 chain split scenario happens is if a URSF client is made and run. Core is neutral on BIP110. BIP110 imposes more restrictive rules. Apathy is compliance.
This is not a democracy. This is nodes imposing their will. And the only way that a BIP110 chain split scenario happens is if a URSF client is made and run. Core is neutral on BIP110. BIP110 imposes more restrictive rules. Apathy is compliance.
