I think you argue that cultur can define right and wrong doing, while anarchy explains that there are objective rights and wrongs. So independent of the culture.
I hardly think that one can form an a...
> anarchy explains
Yes, because you believe in a specific type of anarchy, you believe in certain things downstream of that root belief. My contention is that natural rights and natural law aren't real.
> those objective morals are a basic logic of our species survival
We have good evidence that within and between small scale hunter-gatherer tribes there has been violence up to and including homicide over access to scarce resources and females. The supposed objective morals are not a basic logic of our species survival. Humanity was extremely small scale and subject to potential extinction for a long time. It was only with the development of agriculture that population began to increase significantly. It was also when people began enslaving one another.
Yes, because you believe in a specific type of anarchy, you believe in certain things downstream of that root belief. My contention is that natural rights and natural law aren't real.
> those objective morals are a basic logic of our species survival
We have good evidence that within and between small scale hunter-gatherer tribes there has been violence up to and including homicide over access to scarce resources and females. The supposed objective morals are not a basic logic of our species survival. Humanity was extremely small scale and subject to potential extinction for a long time. It was only with the development of agriculture that population began to increase significantly. It was also when people began enslaving one another.
1