Do you believe that everyone they're commanded to kill deserves it in your moral framework? If not, that's a divergence in beliefs. Once again, in their eyes this is an objectively moral command fro...
I think you argue that cultur can define right and wrong doing, while anarchy explains that there are objective rights and wrongs. So independent of the culture.
I hardly think that one can form an argument to say, that there is no objective moral only because there are people, which disrespect those morals. It proves the ignorance of individuals and societies to those objective morals.
But I would argue, that those objective morals are a basic logic of our species survival. So when every human would disrespect them in every encounter with an other person, humanity would selfdestruct.
Therefore objective rights or wrongs are simply a description of general rights and wrongs, which can be adopted by every person and it allowes a properous society.
I hardly think that one can form an argument to say, that there is no objective moral only because there are people, which disrespect those morals. It proves the ignorance of individuals and societies to those objective morals.
But I would argue, that those objective morals are a basic logic of our species survival. So when every human would disrespect them in every encounter with an other person, humanity would selfdestruct.
Therefore objective rights or wrongs are simply a description of general rights and wrongs, which can be adopted by every person and it allowes a properous society.
1