Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the point is that the things it does well were learned from competent developers who did those things well. It's when you try to do actual engineering that hasn't been done well before that you start seeing problems. Novel problems. In my experience, it's been a faster version of stackoverflow copypasta. It's better, but only when I'm trying to solve a problem that's already been solved. Otherwise I find myself running in circles with it and have to figure the problem out myself. I've noticed this while working on my terminal client. Some of the issues I've faced haven't been solved in ten other clients already because the environment is so different. Ideally, the issues I solve will become training data for the next guy.

I suspect this is why I often see many of the same bugs in different Nostr applications. It's just regurgitating variations of the same stuff. This isn't necessarily bad. But it can be.