Damus
Jack K · 1d
It’s a reinterpretation of time as a quantized process and object as empirically demonstrated by bitcoin. Since both QM and GR assume continuous time, you could say it’s novel. But this is more a...
AJ2884 profile picture
If you make a different set of assumptions, and draw a different set of conclusions, and don't back it up with the math to show that it agrees with observed experimental results, how do you know where the reinterpretation holds true, and where conjectures and conclusions become more misleading than elucidating?
1
Jack K · 18h
I don’t need to assume Bitcoin is true. Bitcoin is the only mathematical object that is truth in operation. Everything else; our models, equations, and theories are symbolic approximations. A model on a blackboard never produces time or truth on its own. To cross that boundary, it must be instant...