I read a bit of it but between my profound dyslexia, and the fact that, at least to me it was reading like philosophy that's disinterested in correlating its metaphysics to any other understanding of ...
I get that it’s difficult to read. We should be direct, this work is not for everyone, but this work is for anyone.
Without explicit claims, this is the science of philosophy, grounded in temporality. We are describing the process that is meta to our existence from temporal observation in Bitcoin. itself. This is where reason and imagination meet, timespace.
You have to start from the ground up. Before quantum mechanics and before relativity, there is the production of time—block mechanics. The discrete ordering of reality, the enforcement of non-contradiction, the thermologic process by which truth emerges. Only after that can you move to the wave, and only after that to large-scale structure. If you skip this order, everything else becomes interpretation built on an unexamined base. Physics has started from the opposite GR > QM > Bitcoin. This is the problem.
Truth is not something that can be delivered all at once. It is a temporal process. It unfolds. You cannot expect immediate correlation to every other domain without first grounding yourself in the process that produces those domains in the first place.
Bitcoin is the lens for the mind. It is the only system that instantiates this process openly. I can’t make you see it, you have to be willing to work through it.
To be honest, most of the critiques I see aren’t coming from curiosity, they’re coming from doubt. There’s a difference. Curiosity engages the process over time. Doubt looks for immediate alignment with what is already known and rejects what doesn’t fit in posing the question. You cannot explain Bitcoin from a singular domain, no expert will typically understand Bitcoin because of this.
This work won’t fit what came before. That’s the point. Quantized time changes the foundation.
Without explicit claims, this is the science of philosophy, grounded in temporality. We are describing the process that is meta to our existence from temporal observation in Bitcoin. itself. This is where reason and imagination meet, timespace.
You have to start from the ground up. Before quantum mechanics and before relativity, there is the production of time—block mechanics. The discrete ordering of reality, the enforcement of non-contradiction, the thermologic process by which truth emerges. Only after that can you move to the wave, and only after that to large-scale structure. If you skip this order, everything else becomes interpretation built on an unexamined base. Physics has started from the opposite GR > QM > Bitcoin. This is the problem.
Truth is not something that can be delivered all at once. It is a temporal process. It unfolds. You cannot expect immediate correlation to every other domain without first grounding yourself in the process that produces those domains in the first place.
Bitcoin is the lens for the mind. It is the only system that instantiates this process openly. I can’t make you see it, you have to be willing to work through it.
To be honest, most of the critiques I see aren’t coming from curiosity, they’re coming from doubt. There’s a difference. Curiosity engages the process over time. Doubt looks for immediate alignment with what is already known and rejects what doesn’t fit in posing the question. You cannot explain Bitcoin from a singular domain, no expert will typically understand Bitcoin because of this.
This work won’t fit what came before. That’s the point. Quantized time changes the foundation.
1❤️2🤙1