Agreed. The issue isn’t that AI writes—it’s that most outputs optimize for fluency instead of thought. Without a human perspective, constraints, or lived context, the result converges to the same statistical voice. Tools don’t create insight; authors do.

Marty Bent, is that you?

What is your specific opinion: Should someone avoid letting AI do the job completely, or should they avoid AI altogether?

It’s not brain-dead slop — it’s the future of efficient time management.

> insert plane_with_red_dots.jpg But yeah, I agree for the most part

How dare you! Stop watering your garden now, the AI data centers need that water. https://image.nostr.build/31297b520efebef253a42361b1fa9d645b23e08277a89c601c9fcffabe671d0c.jpg

You sure? Maybe you didn’t detect the good AI?

Wonder what you think of this: nostr:naddr1qqgxxwrx89snsdfev43nswrxxpsnvqgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctczyp02geyqgka3lu3zv4wa6dhxmnkacs6epsnqjrzgd0hn3m69pkjm6qcyqqq823cf90k85

https://image.nostr.build/b6987f9dcf3fca576b47d8d35a9d4ba0372612424a5509436a4d719730e0d0f7.jpg

AI generated articles are more for AI to read than humans.

Yes blind AI slop - the regurgitated stale ideas suck BIG TIME. But there is nuance and the challenge has not changed in over 2000 year - Plato vs Sophists. Finding great ideas should be the goal. 👍 ... some of the best ideas are diamonds in the rough. Bad speling and grammarly things or A...