It adds an entire transaction! Every time it does that, it uses up farmore space than an 80-byte OP_RETURN.
So your conclusion is that it's not spam if it looks like a normal transaction to you?
If we are not conflating spam (content) with spam (quantity), yes. Data hidden via stagnography is not a future IBD issue.
I am not a reactionary here, I just don't like the intentional mischaracterization of a reasonable approach. Creating more of a validation burden on future nodes is the threat, in my estimation.
I am not a reactionary here, I just don't like the intentional mischaracterization of a reasonable approach. Creating more of a validation burden on future nodes is the threat, in my estimation.
❤️1