regulation is reactionary. if the claim is toward a staged crisis you need proactive action. this is evidence for crisis exploitation (unsurprising) rather than crisis being manufactured.

what i think happens is way more dynamic. generally speaking you have 2 defauly foundations:

X = Those responding to a crisis event according to their best interests

Y = Those deliberately causing crisis events in order to obtain desired benefits

you can predict well for both of these models individually and jointly - they are both players in the game. in all the models i've run monetary gain is a very low evidentiary outcome.

burocratic systems are not robotic. in fact i think many would agree that they are highly inefficient. is government itself the cause of crisis? becuase without provable human coordination you need some mechanism to produce a staged outcome. personally i don't think systems theory alone can account for any of the current crisis we have seen. retrospective narratives often fail to account for the scale of geopolitics. the game board is much larger and has many more players vying for dominance.

the staging/conspiracy question has a very high legal bar to prove. to get there, the more important question needs to be: at what level is coordination happening? this is nuanced, not a binary.