Damus
Jack K profile picture
Jack K
@Jackk
https://youtu.be/kTcytKVP66k?

Return to pre-fiat physics you say?

-Continuous time cannot solve the double-spend problem of energy.
-Continuous time cannot define measurement.
-Continuous time cannot demonstrate the mechanics by which a discrete, bounded mathematical state space upholds conservation through discrete blocks of time.
- Continuous time cannot explain why the Planck time scale exists as a fundamental limit of time.
- Continuous time cannot account for the energy-mass equivalence of information or resolve the problem of quantum gravity.
- Continuous time cannot prove the work.
- Continuous cannot properly define Planck Energy as a universal constant of work.
- Continuous time cannot unite Shannon and Boltzmann Entropies and time from an empirical thermological process that produces a chronological state.
- Continuous time cannot properly define quantum computation and the unified field.
- Continuous time cannot survive if a quantized block of time has higher explanatory power than the wave in the transition from a superposed quantized state to a binary classic state.
- Continuous time cannot resolve the Genesis Block.
- Continuous time cannot resolve Turning’s Halting Problem.

Bitcoin already did. Proof of work is measured in joules. Bitcoin is not a theory. Thank you Satoshi.

Fiat physics is in check.

Don’t trust me, verify for yourself. Go do the work. We are waiting. Seriously, how many blocks does it take?

Nobody understands money. Stay humble.

291❤️2
Iggy · 1w
Jack, your work is beyond comprehension for many people. It would be amazing to see you continue developing your ideas without endless debates with advocates of continuous time. Timespace is the way.
Kyma Fi · 1w
I agree. Satoshi proved that continuous time is purely mathematical - useful but not reality.
Goose_in_Gensokyo · 1w
Nice list of formulaes, actually, it's deep and good fundamental work. (the rightmost part of the last one seemed counter-intuitive to me, until I noticed that p is 1...0, so, ln(p) is always 0 or less; I have a feeling this part of formulae worth to dig deeper... for example, it fundamentally lim...