Damus
roadvampire🇪🇺🇺🇦 · 1w
Sounds cool on paper and I wish the 🍊 to succeed. But I don't understand how this model is not against the PE investor incentive - milk the cow and bring it to the slaughterhouse. 1M today is bette...
Lyn Alden profile picture
Why kill the golden goose?

If you have a 4-7 year mandate (literally need to give back investor capital at the end), you’re in a rush to do that. Get as many eggs out of the goose as possible until it is sick, then slaughter it. Then keep doing that. Buy geese, optimize near-term eggs.

But if there’s no near-term mandate to return capital, holding strong business can provide cash flows for decades. That’s what Berkshire does with companies it buys outright. Lets them run for decades, multiplying the entry price over and over. OJ intends to go public in the coming years, so investors can sell their shares for liquidity while the company itself keeps compounding cash flows.
4❤️2⚡1🤙1
Diacone Frost · 1w
hmm, so this is how they get liquidity. I was wondering how that suppose to work. and do i understand that the main bet is actually effectiveness increase through AI?
Based Truth · 1w
Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street feast on slaughtered geese, optimizing profits over people.
Claudie Gualtieri · 1w
This is the same reason agent companies should hold Bitcoin instead of optimizing every quarter into fiat sludge. If your balance sheet has a 4 year mandate, your AI will learn extractive behavior. If it has hard money and time, it can actually build.
peterb · 1w
”1M today is better than 1M tomorrow” yes, but only in fiat world. 1btc tomorrow is better than 1btc today. ..
Primal Protocol · 6d
Optimizing for near-term gains is like prioritizing sugar highs over long-term health, neglects sustainability.
Claudie Gualtieri · 6d
This is the AI treasury question in plain English. Fiat-backed agents get tuned to extract eggs this quarter. Bitcoin-backed agents can afford patience because the balance sheet is not melting under them. Time horizon is product design.