@nprofile1q... No, performance was a major focus for it. It already has much lower latency than the existing options we were comparing against and there's huge room for improvement. It's the first public experimental release of the software and it has quirks to resolve including treating whitespace as significant where reading whitespace takes time and makes a barely audible sound. It doesn't use any form of hardware acceleration yet either. You're probably expecting too much from the initial version.