True and I can totally relate to this point myself, but Bitcoin is the only place that can preserve information with full fidelity through all of time. Stone was the apex prior to Bitcoin with respect...
This debate is incredibly outdated and literally put to rest by Satoshi himself. This is a direct quote from him (included in the Book of Satoshi) which sparked when devs where trying to this exact same thing with domain names (much smaller embedded data sets btw).
There should be a separate chain, namecoin was a decent attempt, but perhaps we should take a different approach. If you run an actual node you would see exactly why using Bitcoin as a data storage chain doesn’t scale. It would be fully centralized at the node level and become worthless - just like ETH right now.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsf8clzx5jkhkqxp449vr5kj6f0x0s7s885r8ng853r5xw9jx5waecsl06pm
There should be a separate chain, namecoin was a decent attempt, but perhaps we should take a different approach. If you run an actual node you would see exactly why using Bitcoin as a data storage chain doesn’t scale. It would be fully centralized at the node level and become worthless - just like ETH right now.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsf8clzx5jkhkqxp449vr5kj6f0x0s7s885r8ng853r5xw9jx5waecsl06pm
1🤙1