HODL
· 71w
I used to believe in Hanlon’s razor.
That it was inaccurate to attribute things to malice which could be explained by incompetence.
Complete bullshit.
It’s all malice.
The incompetence is ...
Hanlon's razor isn't about accuracy; it's more like giving the benefit of a doubt. That is, the default presumption should be unintentional incompetence until there is no reasonable doubt of malice. Purposeful incompetence, on the other hand, is itself a form of malice; so it's still consistent with Hanlon's razor to call it malice when you see it.