Good luck on that brit

No. Who determines what is harmful

No. Lightly disincentivezed if it's only hurtful for yourself, but not banned. If it's also hurtful to others, well that's a different issue.

I think the argument is around "harmful to yourself". I think there are arguably already many laws that don't give you permission to "harm yourself".

Makes me want to start smoking.

nope

UK likes to ban things. Sooner or later, you won’t be able to take a shit without getting a license from the government. 😂

Asking this to the nostr void is pretty rhetorical don’t you think?

Id expect this question from my mother only.

Nope. Never. And I dont care what it is. Someone wants to smoke meth all day? Have at it.

No

We have been indoctrinated through school and media to think it is okay violate other peoples free will, passions, habits and customs. To think this is okay, leaves with unlimited encroachment on the individuals liberty. There only exist 2 reasons for limiting other peoples freedom. - If they harm...

Aside from very obvious data and evidence. Who is to say what is harmful? Government interferes foo much. Also worth noting that smokers were less affected by "Covid".

Energy may be better spent focusing on the criminalisation of free speech there 😬

Smoking bans only exist to drive up vape sales because if given the choice nobody would vape.

Smokers were less likely to die from Covid. Nicotine is nueroprotective. Smoking is, on the whole, bad for us, but banning for entire population is retarded.

Organic tobacco is a super plant, like a super food. Those who have tried it know. It literally makes you feel super human. TPTB know this. If you can grow your own, do it.

Should you be banned from doing something harmful to yourself? > that’s something your father must decide if you’re not of age, and later it’s on you. The government isn’t anyone’s father, and it should stop pretending to be. If anything, the government is closer to your nuts uncle who wa...

No, imo

absolutly not